Accessibility Tools

Sunday 15th, December, 2024

4:33 PM EAT

BREAKING NEWS

No data was found

Happening Now!

No data was found
411

Complainants claim 4 CJ nominees unsuitable to hold office

username
Kenya Rugby Union, in its memorandum, claim Wekesa, who is set to be interviewed on April 22 would be the wrong choice for the CJ.
Judicial Service Commission
The site where interviews to find the next Chief Justice are being conducted by the Judicial Service Commission. PHOTO | JSC | TWITTER

Listen to this article

Enhance your reading experience by listening to this article

Three complaints have been filed at the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) opposing the candidature of four individuals shortlisted for the position of the Chief Justice.

Petitioners claim Prof Moni Wekesa, Senior Counsels Fred Ngatia, Philip Murgor and Prof Kameri Mbote , are unsuitable to head the Judiciary and the Apex Court.

Kenya Rugby Union, in its memorandum, claim Wekesa, who is set to be interviewed on April 22 would be the wrong choice for the CJ.

According to KRU, Prof Wekesa, who had been appointed to chair the Kenya Anti-Doping Taskforce by then Sports Cabinet Secretary Hassan Wario Arero in 2013, had accused the national team of doping.

The union says the taskforce, led by Wekesa, claimed there was systematic doping of players at the national team and two of the clubs through use of food supplements laced with steroids.

His taskforce reported that the food supplements under use by the Kenya Rugby Sevens team were banned substances contravening both World Rugby and KEU Regulations, which caused a public uproar and media scrutiny.

“Prof Wekesa would lead the public attempt, especially media, to justify the report despite KRU’s immediate protestation and challenge the flawed process,” stated KRU’s chairman Oduor Gangla.

In another memorandum, a lobby group, Atheists in Kenya, claim Ngatia is not best suited for the job as he represented President Uhuru Kenyatta in the disputed 2017 presidential petition. According to the lobby group, Ngatia will compromise the independence of the Supreme Court and they lack confidence in his ability to safeguard the rights and freedoms of Kenyans to ensure equal protection for all.

“Senior Counsel Ngatia defended the President’s disputed win in a presidential petition filed by Raila Odinga in 2013 and 2017. It is obvious that his personal interests are likely to be contrary to his loyalty to the Kenyan public as Chief Justice,” argued the Lobby group.

Law Society of Kenya on the other hand, filed a further complaint against Prof Mbote, Annie Gathiru and Murgor.

Through President Nelson Havi, LSK claims that Prof Mbote, Gathiru lacked integrity and would not be suitable for nomination for appointment as Chief Justice for that reason.

Before you go…how about joining our vibrant Telegram and WhatsApp channels for hotter stories?

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Viral Stories

APC with turrets at the National Port in Haiti. PHOTO/@MSSMHaiti/X

Haiti gang kills 110 people accused of witchcraft

Former President Uhuru Kenyatta with President William Ruto at his Gatundu home. PHOTO/@4thPresidentKE/X

Ruto visits Uhuru at his Gatundu home

Court gavel. PHOTO/Pexels

Malindi court sentences man to life imprisonment for incest

Nairobi Woman Rep Esther Passaris

‘May this spirit of unity guide us towards a prosperous future’ – Esther Passaris speaks on Ruto’s visit to Uhuru

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(function(w,q){w[q]=w[q]||[];w[q].push(["_mgc.load"])})(window,"_mgq");

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Stay informed on the latest news by subscribing to the best categories of your interest.