Women were never meant to give birth on their backs – experts
By BBC, April 5, 2026It’s usually more dangerous for women to give birth lying down, so why do they? It’s all because of a Frenchman who decided it was more convenient – for men.
For thousands of years, across the world, women tended to give birth in an upright position, whether kneeling as per Cleopatra, using birthing stools and chairs, or squatting. In fact, squatting can enlarge the pelvic diameter by at least 2.5cm (1in), while working with gravity makes it far easier to give birth.
So why do so many women today give birth on their backs?
“There is a generalised ignorance amongst professions and pregnant women about the physiology of birth,” says Janet Balaskas, founder of the Active Birth Centre in the UK, and author of several books detailing how mothers can take control of their birth experience. In 1982, Balaskas published an “active birth manifesto” that became the central tenet of her organisation.
“Throughout the world, and for thousands of years, women have spontaneously laboured and given birth in some form of upright or crouching positions,” the manifesto reads. “Whatever the race or culture… the same upright positions predominate.”
Most women in post-industrial countries are confined to a hospital in recumbent positions, Balaskas says.
“This practice is illogical, making birth needlessly complicated and expensive, turning a natural process into a medical event and the labouring woman into a passive patient,” she argues.
“No other species adopts such a disadvantageous position at such a crucial time.”
Other experts agree. In fact, giving birth lying down is a “relatively modern phenomenon”, Hannah Dahlen, professor of midwifery at Australia’s Western Sydney University, wrote in a 2013 op-ed for The Conversation.
Pregnancy as ‘illness’
It’s only in the past 300 to 400 years that women have been largely giving birth on their backs. They can thank a Frenchman named François Mauriceau. He claimed that the reclining position would be both more comfortable for the pregnant woman and more convenient for the male physician attending to her (there was already a movement emerging to dispense of midwives and instead have male surgeons present at births).
Mauriceau viewed pregnancy as an illness. In his 1668 book The Diseases of Women with child and in child-bed, Mauriceau advised: “The best and surest is to be delivered in their bed, to shun the inconvenience and trouble of being carried thither afterwards.”
However, some scholars argue that the change in birthing position may actually be due to another Frenchman who lived at the same time as Mauriceau, King Louis XIV.
“Since Louis XIV reportedly enjoyed watching women giving birth, he became frustrated by the obscured view of birth when it occurred on a birthing stool, and promoted the new reclining position,” wrote Lauren Dundes, a professor of sociology at McDaniel College in Maryland, US, in her 1987 paper on the evolution of birthing positions.
Proven by science
The main reason women have given birth in upright positions for so many thousands of years is simple: gravity. A baby has to travel downwards through the birthing canal, and gravity is beneficial to the process.
It has been shown that left to their own devices, women will instinctively lean forward during labour – not backwards – adopting positions such as squatting, leaning forward on their hands and knees, or leaning against a low piece of furniture.
A 2013 review of 25 studies involving more than 5,200 women noted that other important outcomes for women who gave birth upright and mobile rather than lying down in bed included “a reduction in the risk of Caesarean birth, less use of epidural as a method of pain relief, and less chance of their babies being admitted to the neonatal unit”.
The review did note that more studies were needed for women in high-risk groups – some studies have shown an increase in blood loss in upright birth positions.